Blog April 8, 2025

A Guide to Choosing the Right Distribution Strategy

Centralized vs. Decentralized Warehousing: How to Choose the Right Distribution Strategy

By: Tommy Colangelo 

April 8, 2025 | 5 min read

When selecting a distribution strategy, several considerations shape the decision-making process beyond cost alone. The decision between centralized and decentralized warehousing strategies can vary significantly depending on the unique characteristics of each industry, business, and client. Factors such as customer requirements, product types, geographical considerations, and operational constraints will influence the most suitable approach. A one-size-fits-all approach is not appropriate when it comes to prioritizing service levels and costs. They need to be balanced according to specific industry, business or client requirements. In this blog post, we’ll explore the core concepts behind lead time, service levels, and network strategies, highlighting the pros and cons of centralized versus decentralized warehousing.

At the heart of your network strategy is five key questions:

  1. What is the desired lead time (post-manufacturing) to customers?

This helps determine the optimal average distance between your facilities and customers.

  1. Who are my customers, and where are they located?

Understanding customer locations, along with established lead times, will influence where to strategically position your distribution centers.

  1. What level of service do I need to provide to my customers?

Service levels will impact decisions about the SKU assortment and inventory at each facility.

  1. How do customer demand patterns and variability affect inventory needs?

These factors influence safety stock levels and inventory planning.

  1. How will inbound and outbound transportation costs affect inventory location?

For example, slower-moving products may be consolidated in larger, central warehouses, while regional warehouses could receive transfers to replenish stock or meet demand.

With these questions, operators can better understand the trade-offs between cost, speed, and service quality. The decision on whether to centralize or decentralize warehousing operations hinges on the specific needs of your customer base and the operational realities of your business. Let’s examine how these choices impact everything from transportation costs to inventory management and facility infrastructure.

Definitions:

  1. Lead-time: Total time between when an order is placed and when the customer receives the product.
  2. Service Level: Percentage probability that customer demand will be fulfilled within a specified time.
  3. Service Level Agreement (SLA): The agreed-upon thresholds for service levels, including the required time period for delivery. For this discussion, the defined time frame is the expected lead-time for customer orders.
  4. Centralized Warehousing: A single warehouse that serves an entire market—such as one facility covering the entire U.S.
  5. Decentralized Warehousing: Utilizes multiple warehouses strategically placed in different regions to serve specific market areas, such as several facilities covering various parts of the U.S.

Increased Service Levels Correlate Positively to Sales and Cost:

Typically, the quicker a business can meet customer demand, the more sales it can generate. High service levels lead to faster delivery, improved accuracy, and stronger customer loyalty, boosting competitiveness. However, achieving higher service levels comes with increased operational costs, higher inventory levels and additional transportation and labor expenses.

There is a point of diminishing returns, where the costs of improving service levels outweigh the benefits in sales. As service levels rise, additional sales gains may not justify the extra costs. The additional costs are composed of occupancy costs, operating costs, labor costs, inventory holding costs and transportation costs.

Thus, businesses need to select a distribution strategy that balances service level improvements with cost efficiency, finding the optimal point where the investment in service maximizes returns without overspending on resources that offer diminishing value. Understanding customer needs and operational constraints is key to achieving this balance.

Line graph displaying sales & operating costs vs service level

Figure 1: Sales & Operating Cost vs Service Level

Customers and Product Types Impact Distribution Strategy Decisions

For direct-to-consumer models, customers generally expect shorter delivery times, often demanding rapid fulfillment (such as next-day or two-day delivery) (See figure 2 below). These shorter lead times typically necessitate closer proximity to the customer, which can influence your warehousing decisions.

Conversely, business-to-business (B2B) operations, especially those with larger, planned orders, may be able to tolerate longer lead times, as the focus is often on bulk shipments or pre-scheduled deliveries. Lead time expectations in B2B models are often built into SLAs, allowing for longer fulfillment windows.

Understanding your customer base is critical in determining whether a centralized or decentralized warehousing strategy best aligns with your lead time goals and overall service expectations.

Graph showing Expected average days to received order from online purchase by commodity

Figure 2: Expected average days to receive order from online purchase by commodity (The future shopper report – 2023 by Wunderman Thompson’s: https://www.vml.com/insight/the-future-shopper-report-2023)

In B2B models, lead times are typically longer as shipments are often pre-planned, with delivery windows set in SLAs. These businesses can accommodate longer lead times because they plan inventory and shipping in advance.

However, lead times are also influenced by product characteristics. Perishable goods require tighter lead times to maintain freshness, making proximity to customers crucial. In these cases, a decentralized warehousing strategy, with multiple facilities closer to customers, is necessary to reduce delivery time.

For non-perishable items, longer lead times are usually acceptable, and a centralized warehouse model can be more cost-effective. This approach allows businesses to consolidate inventory and reduce operating costs, while still meeting agreed-upon SLAs.

Centralized vs. Decentralized Warehousing for Your Distribution Strategy

When planning your distribution strategy, the choice between centralized and decentralized operations can significantly impact your costs, service levels, and overall supply chain performance. Here’s a breakdown of the key differences:

Centralized Warehousing:

  • Lower warehousing costs: Since a single, larger warehouse serves a broader area, you benefit from economies of scale and cost optimizations of having everything under one roof.
  • Lower inbound transfers to warehouses: Fewer warehouses mean fewer locations to ship products to. Lane costs can be negotiated to reduce $/lb-mile when moving high volumes/lane. Transfer order truckload utilization can also be maximized with higher overall volumes by segment.
  • Higher customer delivery costs: Because the warehouse is often located farther from the customer, the cost of shipping products to the end customer increases.
  • Greater distance from customers: Centralized facilities are typically located at central points within the region or country, which means they are not necessarily close to the end consumer, leading to longer delivery times.
  • Lower service levels & higher lead times: With longer delivery distances, you may face higher lead times and potentially lower service levels (i.e., the ability to fulfill orders within the expected time frame).
  • Lower inventory holding costs: Consolidation of inventories in one warehouse reduces the demand variability which reduces the overall required safety stocks. Capital usually tied up in inventory is free to be invested elsewhere.

Decentralized Warehousing:

  • Higher warehousing costs: Operating multiple smaller warehouses requires a larger total footprint (more inventory and support structures (i.e. offices)), which leads to higher costs.
  • Increased inbound transfers to warehouses: More warehouses means more complex logistics for inter-facility transfers, which adds costs and complexity to the supply chain.
  • Significantly lower customer delivery costs: With warehouses spread across regions, products can be delivered more quickly and cheaply to customers, reducing last-mile delivery costs.
  • Closer proximity to customers: Decentralized warehouses are positioned closer to customer locations, allowing faster delivery times and better responsiveness to demand fluctuations.
  • Higher service levels & lower lead times: The closer you are to your customers, the faster you can fulfill orders, leading to improved service levels and shorter lead times.
  • Higher inventory holding costs: Operating multiple warehouses increases the site level demand variability leading to increased overall network safety stocks. More capital is tied up in inventory.

 

The choice between centralized and decentralized warehousing is critical for optimizing supply chain efficiency, service levels, and cost. Centralized warehousing offers economies of scale and lower inventory holding costs but can result in slower delivery times and higher customer delivery expenses. Decentralized warehousing, while increasing operational costs, allows for faster deliveries and higher service levels by positioning warehouses closer to customers. The best approach depends on factors such as customer needs, product types, and lead-time expectations. Businesses must carefully evaluate these elements to strike the right balance between cost, speed, and service, ensuring a distribution strategy that supports long-term success.

Reach out to Tommy Colangelo with any questions or to discuss further.


Note: The decision between centralized and decentralized warehousing strategies can vary significantly depending on the unique characteristics of each industry, business, and client. Factors such as customer requirements, product types, geographical considerations, and operational constraints will influence the most suitable approach.

 

Below are more details on the advantages and disadvantages of centralized vs decentralized warehousing:

Items

Centralized Warehousing

Decentralized Warehousing

Definition

Central Warehouse serves entire market Market is divided into zones/regions, and every division has its own warehouse

 

Inbound Considerations (From Vendors or Manufacturing Sites)

Transportation

  • Low cost of supply warehouses (fewer and shorter transfers)
  • Higher cost of supplying warehouses (more transfers
  • Cost of transfers to warehouses can be significantly cheaper with economies of scale. Lane negotiations reduce the $/lb-mile to ship for high volume lanes.
  • Risk of additional warehouse-warehouse transfers to large increase of demand or if products are ordered that are not held locally.

 

Management

  • Fewer transportation vendors to manage
 

  • More transportation vendors to manage

 

Warehousing Considerations

Inventory Levels & Cost

  • Centralized warehouses require less overall network inventory due to the consolidation of customers and the reduction of SKU level demand variations lead to lower safety stocks
  • Lower inventory levels free up cash to grow/invest in the business
  • Decentralized warehouses require more overall inventory due to having fewer customers per site, which increases demand variability
  • Higher inventory holding costs = less free cash for investments

 

Infrastructure & Equipment

  • Centralized warehousing requires fewer, larger sites.
  • Smaller Total footprint of facilities as “redundant” space is consolidated (offices, docks, etc.)
  • Better asset utilization (less down time)
  • Higher throughputs make automated solutions more viable
 

  • Decentralized warehousing requires more facilities, which means more occupancy costs
  • Larger overall footprint
  • Decentralized warehouses tend to be closer to customers, which make land and occupancy $/SF higher

 

Management & Labor

  • Less management staff required (higher ratio of direct vs indirect)
  • More stable workforce due to smaller variations in total demand

 

 

  • More management staff required (lower ratio of salaried to hourly)
  • Higher fluctuation of demand leads to variation in workforce requirements and potentially poorer utilization of resources

 

Delivery to Customer Consideration

Transportation

  • Cost of servicing customers can be significantly higher

 

 

  • Lower cost of servicing customers
  • Delivery cost to customer is typically higher than transfers

 

Service Levels

  • Greater average distance to customer increases total lead time and reduces service levels
 

  • Proximity to customers reduces lead times and increases service levels

 

Related Posts

Let’s build world-class infrastructure together.

Book a Consultation

Are you ready for logistics automation?

Take our readiness quiz to find out!

Begin Assessment