Are you ready for logistics automation? Take our readiness quiz to find out!
Blog April 14, 2026
Food loss in distribution is small, but that doesn’t mean it’s insignificant.
By Gina Morris, Consultant
Updated: April 14, 2026 | 6 min read
An Overlooked Link in the Supply Chain
For years, mainstream food loss and waste discussions have predominantly focused upstream, on farms, or downstream, on retailers and households. But this has left an important link in the chain understudied. To fill this gap, ReFED partnered with LIDD to estimate loss rates in food distribution, the often-overlooked nexus between farmers and manufacturers on the one hand, and retailers and food service providers on the other.
This work represents the first known attempt to quantify food loss rates, expressed as percentages, in the U.S. distribution sector.
Food distributors function as wholesale intermediaries. They purchase products in large quantities from manufacturers or growers, and sell them to foodservice providers (e.g. restaurants, hotels, public institutions) or retailers. Distributors aggregate products from different sources into a single warehouse or distribution center with different temperature zones. As the middlemen, they assume the financial risk associated with storage, spoilage, and fluctuating demand.
Low Loss by Percentage, High Impact by Scale
Distributors play a highly optimized role, with limited or no food processing, fast inventory turnover, and strong incentives to protect slim margins. It is therefore somewhat unsurprising that average food loss rates in U.S. distribution are low.
LIDD’s study found that just 0.73% of food entering distribution is lost or wasted.
Despite this, because distributors handle enormous throughputs, even small percentage losses translate into meaningful amounts of food and value being lost.
What Does This Loss Look Like In Practice?
The research found that 40% of food losses are driven by handling and transportation issues. This includes, for example, load shifting during transit that can damage products, and lead to entire pallets or cases being discarded. In warehouses, incidents considered part of normal operations, like forklift damage, although infrequent, can also contribute to significant waste volumes over time.
Equipment and storage issues account for another 33% of losses. These include less frequent but high‑volume instances of loss that occur, for instance, when entire truckloads are rejected upon receipt due to food safety concerns or temperature failures tied to equipment or storage failures.
Where Does It End Up?
When loss occurs, LIDD’s research shows that nearly half (49%) continues to be sent to landfill. 33% is donated, and the remaining 18% is diverted to composting, animal feed, or anaerobic digestion.
Why Loss Prevention and Diversion Matter
These insights matter economically, environmentally, and socially.
Distributors operate on tight profit margins, where every efficiency gain counts, and so, improving loss prevention and diversion can reduce disposal costs and protect revenue. Many of the causes of food loss in distribution could be prevented or significantly reduced simply by adopting best industry practices and tightening operations.
Environmentally, not only does food loss squander the land, water, and energy that went into producing it, but also, where it is sent to decompose in landfill, it releases CO2 and methane that contributes to global warming. An estimated 29% of the U.S. food supply was wasted in 2024, according to ReFED estimates, and, globally, the FAO and UNEP estimate that food loss accounts for 8-10% of greenhouse gas emissions.
Socially, and because much of the food surplus that occurs is packaged and edible, there is also potential to redirect surplus towards food rescue organizations. While prevention is always the preferred option for distributors, there is rising awareness of opportunities to donate edible surplus where it occurs, especially with food prices and food insecurity on the rise across the country.
Looking Beyond the Warehouse: Reverse Donation Logistics
Beyond the walls of their own warehouses, distributors can contribute to creative solutions by partnering with their clients to redirect surplus occurring elsewhere towards emergency food organizations. One promising way of doing so is through reverse donation logistics: the practice of using existing commercial delivery routes, trucks, and facilities to collect surplus food from customers on return trips and redirect it to emergency food organizations. Rather than relying on multiple, small-scale nonprofit pickup systems, this model embeds donation directly into day‑to‑day distribution operations, making recovery more consistent, efficient, and scalable.
Case Study: How Vesta Foodservice Built Donation into Daily Operations
Vesta Foodservice, a produce and specialty foodservice distributor operating across California, Nevada, and Arizona, offers a compelling example of how this can work in practice. Through Chefs to End Hunger, a charity it founded in 2012, Vesta integrates food donation into its routine deliveries. They offer kits to restaurants and hotels on their usual delivery routes, which consist of a corrugated cardboard box containing aluminum catering trays and a plastic liner to protect the box. The restaurants and hotels fill the catering trays with their surplus food and return it to the Vesta Foodservice driver at their next delivery. Vesta Foodservice then coordinates the distribution of surplus food from across their network of clients to local hunger-relief partners.
Chefs to End Hunger is designed to make food recovery as seamless as possible for operators. Vesta provides the labor, materials, and logistics at no cost to the customer, integrating recovery into existing delivery routes. This approach not only simplifies participation but also helps minimize additional environmental impact by avoiding separate pick-ups. The program also supports customers in meeting food recovery requirements under California’s SB 1383 regulations. The result is a steady, reliable flow of high‑quality food to local hunger‑relief partners, demonstrating how distributors can turn operational efficiency into social impact at scale.
Conclusion
While food loss in distribution may appear modest by percentage, this research illustrates why the sector should no longer be treated as a blind spot in food waste analysis and action. In practice, distribution can have a large impact due to the sector’s scale and the opportunity to mobilize its pre-existing networks to redistribute food surplus occurring further down the supply chain. To translate these insights into action, cross‑sector collaboration will be essential.
Through improved facility practices, investment in diversion infrastructure, and partnerships that embed recovery into existing operations, distributors have a unique opportunity to help build a more resilient, less wasteful food system.
Related Posts
Newsletter
LIDD Insider – Q4 2025
Explore LIDD’s Q4 2025 Insider on Food Insecurity & Food Waste. Discover how optimized supply chains and new facilities are boosting food bank capacity.
Podcast
Addressing Food Waste and Insecurity in the North American Supply Chain
Get insights on how LIDD, Food Banks Canada, and the World Wildlife Fund are working together to help address food waste and insecurity.